sweettartheart: Maggie Smith from Death on the Nile, on a flowered background (Default)
no thoughts just potato ([personal profile] sweettartheart) wrote in [community profile] 100words2026-06-03 08:45 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

This is not an admin post, in the sense that it is not going into the rules. Nor is it meant to diminish anyone's enjoyment of the community. But since I am unable to respond directly to a former community member because I have no avenues to do so, I will talk about community involvement and commenting in [community profile] 100words.

Every community is different. Some people use Dreamwidth for personal journals only. Some use it to share their thoughts or creative works with others. Some come here hoping to find people to talk to and engage with. Some want to limit their involvement in very specific ways. Those are all valid choices.

In [community profile] 100words, your creative works, however you write them, are your own. But when you choose to share your work in this community, it is meant to be a communal activity. That is why AI works are not permitted here; they do not represent your words, and as the moderator I do not feel that it is fair to readers to post AI works here and pretend that they are your words.

Likewise, the communal aspect here requires that when you post here, you do not turn off comments. Perhaps I should have made that clear before, but it has never come up in the past. When it did, I added it to the guidelines and made a post about it. I also did not delete any posts that transgressed a role that had not formerly been elucidated. I attempted to reach out to relevant community members and, when that was not possible, I set a reminder for myself to give anyone who needed to change their posts 24 hours the opportunity to do so. I should have made that clear in my admin post today.

You have the choice to participate in the community. It is not a right. You never have the right to be abusive towards authors or readers here.

That being said, written communication is imperfect. Without tone of voice, without facial expressions, without the many indicators of a person's intent, and without knowing the concerns or triggers or history of the person consuming your written communication, it is impossible to perfectly transfer meaning.

Is there a perfect way to transmit meaning? Probably not. But behaving "in a civilized manner" in this particular community means accepting that when you participate here, you act politely and assume a general level of good intent. If you don't like someone's response to your creative work, perhaps you are misunderstanding their comment. Perhaps they did not expressive themselves well. It really does not matter as long as you all behave in a mature fashion.

As the only moderator of this community, I cannot put myself in timeout. But if you have a problem with me as a commenter, please initiate a discussion with me. Responding in an abusive way to my comment, deleting my comment and your response, turning off comments on your post, and not allowing private messages from me means that I have no ability to engage with you as a community participant in a way that can make this a safe space for everyone.

You don't have to agree with my point of view to be a member of this community. You will abide by the rules if you choose to participate.
torachan: (Default)
Travis ([personal profile] torachan) wrote2026-06-03 05:30 pm
Entry tags:

Daily Happiness

1. The week is halfway through!

2. Since we are planning on trading in our older car when we get a new car, I have decided to use that one for the next few days instead of the newer car, since the old car had just recently been refueled and I do not want to give it to them with a full tank, as it's not like they're going to give us any extra money for all that gas lol. I've got to go to Gardena tomorrow and Friday for work, and we'll go to Disneyland on Saturday, so that should get it down quite a bit and at least let me feel like I'm not totally wasting money for having filled it up.

3. Carla wanted me to stop and get her a bagel this morning on my walk, so I did, and I stopped in at the bakery nextdoor to get a pastry for myself. They have a couple fancy danishes that I've seen in the window recently and wanted to try, so I got the orange one and it was so good! The other one is chocolate strawberry (with the pastry itself being chocolate, not any sort of coating), so I will try that next time.

4. I finished a book I hated today. I wish I could just stop reading, but it really bugs me to do so, so I plodded through, and now I am finally done!

5. Look at this cutie!

senmut: 3 blue seahorse shapes of varying sizes on a dark background (General: Seahorse Triad)
Asp ([personal profile] senmut) wrote2026-06-03 07:14 pm
Entry tags:

June 3 - Inspiring Characters

Next up, having spoken of resonance, I'm asking:

What character has inspired you? Inspiration can be many things. To be better, to pick up a skill, to try a new food, anything.

This one is a toughie for me, because I was constantly tackling encyclopedias to learn new things introduced in books I read, but not necessarily directly because of a character. And I've inflicted several skills I tried to pick up on my original characters, but uncertain if that goes int he other direction.

Fortunately, I'd been warned about Turkish Delight. +g+

So ultimately, I think it comes to being inspired to be better. And I can't pinpoint one. Black Beauty inspired me to look for the best in others (before I became a member of the Certified Cynics). John Carter taught me that I can offer my skills, but ultimately the people around me need to sort themselves out (so don't barrel in with solutions without taking input is the way I modernized that). Moreta made me strive to face challenges with more calm (which honestly helped curb some of my temper for a time).
starwatcher: Western windmill, clouds in background, trees around base. (Default)
StarWatcher ([personal profile] starwatcher) wrote in [community profile] fandom_checkin2026-06-03 05:58 pm
Entry tags:

Daily Check-In

 
This is your check-in post for today. The poll will be open from midnight Universal or Zulu Time (8pm Eastern Time) on Wednesday June 03, to midnight on Thursday, June 04. (8pm Eastern Time).

Poll #34685 Daily Check-in
Open to: Access List, detailed results viewable to: Access List, participants: 8

How are you doing?

I am OK.
8 (100.0%)

I am not OK, but don't need help right now.
0 (0.0%)

I could use some help.
0 (0.0%)

How many other humans live with you?

I am living single.
4 (50.0%)

One other person.
1 (12.5%)

More than one other person.
3 (37.5%)




Please, talk about how things are going for you in the comments, ask for advice or help if you need it, or just discuss whatever you feel like.
 
settiai: (TLoVM -- settiai)
Lynn | Settiai ([personal profile] settiai) wrote2026-06-03 07:52 pm

The Legend of Vox Machina

The first three episodes of The Legend of Vox Machina Season 4 are available, so it's time to start watching and see just how many changes they've made from the campaign this season.

Spoilers for 4x01 under the cut. )

Spoilers for 4x02 under the cut. )

Spoilers for 4x03 under the cut. )
Alpennia Blog ([syndicated profile] alpennia_feed) wrote2026-06-03 11:45 pm

Another Angle on the 18th Century

Posted by Heather Rose Jones

Wednesday, June 3, 2026 - 16:00

This article makes a useful contrast to yesterday's, as it illustrates that people working on the same time and place can interpret the data differently.

Major category: 
Full citation: 

Peakman, Julie. 2004. Lascivious Bodies: A Sexual History of the Eighteenth Century. Atlantic Books, London. Chapter 8 “Tribadism: ‘A New Sort of Sin’”

While most of the articles I summarize focus on specific topics, sometimes there is a publication that provides an excellent overview for a particular era or place. The last one I blogged that fell in this category was Goiwng 2006. Peakman is another such article that provides an excellent overview of the themes and sources relevant to a specific context.

This is a general survey of sexuality in the 18th century. This summary only covers chapter 8 “Tribadism: A New Sort of Sin.” It opens with a quatrain from the satirical poem “The Adulteress” which unambiguously uses “tommy” in reference to sex between women, then move on to a summary of the life of Catherine Vizzani. The Vizzani text represents a medical view still focused on the one-sex model and the interpretation of lesbianism as a form of hermaphroditism.

Other examples are quoted that demonstrate a belief in spontaneous sex-change from female to male. Other quotations reference the belief that masturbation or sex between women could result in clitoral enlargement, which could then be used for penetrative sex. But in contrast, medical opinions were appearing that recognized variation in female anatomy and denied the existence of “true hermaphrodites.”

The article surveys vocabulary used for women who loved women, including tribade, sapphist, and more rarely, lesbian. There is a survey of references to sex between women in literature, including Manley’s The New Atalantis and Fielding’s The Female Husband.

Moralistic literature criticized sex between women, though sometimes attributing it to foreign lands, as in Satan’s Harvest Home, or specifically linking the practice with Sappho. Esther thrills gossipy condemnations are mentioned. [Note: I believe there is an inaccurate implication in the author claiming that Anne Damer “adopted men’s garb,” as the description I’m aware of refers to her wearing a man’s hat, shoes, and jacket, whereas “men’s garb” implies complete cross-dressing.]

On the whole, however, although anxieties and criticisms of lesbianism are common in the documentary record, this didn’t veer into ostracization. It was transgressive, but more serious condemnation was reserved for passing women who lived as men. The distinction in treatment is seen in that the female partners of passing women were less condemned.

Several more detailed case studies are summarized: Benedetta Carlini, Catherine Linck, and Mary Hamilton (though the article is much too credulous of Fielding’s fictional biography). The norms and situation of intimate female friendships is discussed, followed by a summary about Eleanor Butler and Sarah Ponsonby, and a discussion of Anne Lister.

The legal situation of lesbianism in England is discussed, noting that prosecutions were limited to “female husbands,” and those typically when some other complaint brought the matter to light. The more difficult legal situation in Holland and Germany is noted, where sex acts alone might be prosecuted. Variety of lesbian archetypes is noted, with differences in how they were viewed by society.

The next section discusses the treatment of sex between women in erotic literature, originating with French texts, but then appearing in English translations and editions. Erotica blurred the line between masturbation and lesbian sex, including the use of dildos.

The chapter ends with a summary of the main themes discussed above, emphasizing the variety of ideas, images, and practices associated with sex between women in the 18th century.

Time period: 
holmesticemods: (Default)
holmesticemods ([personal profile] holmesticemods) wrote in [community profile] holmestice2026-06-03 04:24 pm

Fic for Vulgarweed

Title: The Mortal Anniversary; or A ghost made them do it.
Recipient: [personal profile] vulgarweed
Author: REDACTED
Verse: ACD Canon
Characters/Pairings: Sherlock Holmes/John Watson, John Watson/Mary Morstan (past), Sherlock Holmes/John Watson/Mary Morstan (as a voyeur)
Rating: Explicit
Warnings: Very very light coercion. Passing mention of past suicidal ideation.
Summary:

For the second year in a row, on the anniversary of her death, I saw my wife waiting for me. Holmes had been returned from his sojourn to Europe for nearly a year, alive and whole though worse for wear; I had sold my practice and moved back into Baker Street; and we had begun an affair. It had been since the start of the year, and now I felt the weight of that decision like a millstone as I tried to ignore my dead wife’s presence. I didn’t regret it. Not for a moment. But I hadn’t expected to look her in the eye five minutes after I’d kissed him goodbye.
“I need to know you’re all right, John,” she said.
“I’m all right,” I said, and it was even true.
“I need to know you’re happy.”


Read on AO3: The Mortal Anniversary
but_can_i_be_trusted: (Pencils)
Echo Invictus ([personal profile] but_can_i_be_trusted) wrote in [community profile] lyricaltitles2026-06-03 04:18 pm

[2026 Album Challenge] Original Fiction: 'I Can Hardly Stand Myself, So What am I to You'

Title: 'I Can Hardly Stand Myself, So What am I to You'
Author: [personal profile] but_can_i_be_trusted
Fandom: Original Fiction
Characters: Original
Rating: G
Warnings: None

Artist: Imagine Dragons
Album: Night Visions
Song: 'Every Night'

Summary: One of these days, he’ll replace her.

I Can Hardly Stand Myself, So What am I to You )
pebbleinalake: (phm question(@elian_panatomicpublishing))
Pebble ([personal profile] pebbleinalake) wrote2026-06-03 06:17 pm

Icons: Kate Sharma [Bridgerton]

Challenge: [community profile] tvmovie20in20
Claim: Kate Sharma
Fandom: Bridgerton


10 THEMES
Unusual Crop Yellow/Orange Triangle Re-Use Matching Text
Pastel Colors Reflected Decorative Border Purple Recolor

5 CATEGORY (Tag you're it)
Fake Background Fake Bg + Text Text + Outline Outline + Texture Texture

5 ARTIST'S CHOICE
1 2 3 4 5
ashelterofpages: (Default)
truth coming out of the deep well ([personal profile] ashelterofpages) wrote2026-06-03 07:06 pm

the sweet sound of my own yawning

A brief update today because my brain is sluggish.

I managed to do some writing for the first time in a month. It's nothing for submission or anything, just a little story for a character I roleplay with my partner, but I think that was good for me. It scratches the same sort of itch that writing fanfic does, and I find that if I keep up doing these kinds of stories alongside the stuff I write for submission, I'm a much happier person.

Tomorrow should be Going Into The World and I'm a little nervous for it. It'll be the most significant amount of walking I'll have done since breaking my toes, so yeah. Hopefully it won't be too bad.
sweettartheart: Maggie Smith from Death on the Nile, on a flowered background (Default)
no thoughts just potato ([personal profile] sweettartheart) wrote in [community profile] 100words2026-06-03 06:48 pm
Entry tags:

ADMIN: Commenting

Hello, all! An addendum to the rules for the community:

Commenting is welcome here. Commenting is encouraged, but not required. I'm sure you all understand how to behave with civility in public.

However, you may not post in this community and disable comments on your post. Your post will be deleted. This is a community, not a personal journal or an archive. If someone leaves you a comment that you feel is inappropriate, please bring it to the attention of the mod if it has not already been addressed.

Thanks!
musesfool: close up of the Chrysler Building (home)
i did it all for the robins ([personal profile] musesfool) wrote2026-06-03 06:35 pm
Entry tags:

the most entertaining personalities

So as you may have surmised from my posts over the years, I've been a sports fan all my life. I'm pretty well versed in baseball, football, hockey, and used to follow tennis as well, but I've only ever been a playoffs basketball fan, though since the Knicks have been in the playoffs the last couple of years, I've become more familiar with them (I was pretty familiar with the Ewing-era Knicks, because all my college friends were into basketball, and the spring/summer of 1994 when both the Rangers and the Knicks were in the playoffs was pretty memorable), so I didn't actually need this, but I did think it was pretty funny: The Knicks Are in the Finals. Act Like You've Been Here Before. #Go New York go New York go!

*
case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-06-03 06:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #7089 ]


⌈ Secret Post #7089 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01. 20.png



More! )


Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1012.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
linky: Lachesis talking with her veil covering her face. (Gotchard: Lachesis - Veil)
Linky ([personal profile] linky) wrote in [community profile] tvfanfiction2026-06-03 05:05 pm

Kamen Rider Gotchard | Lachesis

Title: Help From A Furry Friend
Fandom: Kamen Rider Gotchard
Rating: G
Warnings/Spoilers: Genfic, Canon Divergence, Introspection, Character Study, Cats
Summary: Kyoka meant well. Lachesis knew she did.
Author's Notes: Written for the Girls Remix: Women of Tokusatsu exchange.

On Ao3, On DW
dhampyresa: Paris coat of arms: Gules, on waves of the sea in base a ship in full sail Argent, a chief Azure semé-de-lys Or (fluctuat nec mergitur)
dhampyresa ([personal profile] dhampyresa) wrote2026-06-03 10:24 pm
Entry tags:

DNF: The Everlasting by Alix E. Harrow

The problem with this book is that I'm French.

Alix E. Harrow's The Everlasting is a novel about deconstructing a country's founding myth. Said myth is inspired by Arthuriana and, especially, Joan of Arc. I'm not against Joan of Arc motifs (hell, it's one of the things I love about Margaret Rogerson's Vespertine). I am also pro deconstructing founding myths! Including French founding myths, including Joan of Arc.

However.

However, I think if you're going to be deconstructing a country's myths it should be your own country. Whether its because the book is in English or the author is USAmerican or the fictional country is England-coded (the main narrator so far (25%) is called "Owen Mallory") or a combination but this feels particularly disrespectful. Leave Jeanne alone and go bother George Washington or something.
kaberett: Trans symbol with Swiss Army knife tools at other positions around the central circle. (Default)
kaberett ([personal profile] kaberett) wrote2026-06-03 09:25 pm
Entry tags:

[books] Fight Right, Julie Schwarz Gottman & James Gottman

I am going to lead, moderately emphatically, with: this is not a recommendation for this book (which in any case I haven't finished). The strapline is "how successful couples turn conflict into connection"; it was published in 2024. As [personal profile] recessional has pointed out to me, some of what's going on is that their target audience is specifically people who are treating each other shittily but don't want to break up/divorce/etc, and do want to learn to do better, but don't have the tools for how.

I, however, am very much coming from a perspective of being much more inclined to push for, if not breakups, the idea that there exists unacceptable behaviour one gets to just nope out over, and also of the tradition of DBT workbooks where there is a heavy emphasis on explicitly acknowledging, out loud, with your words, that the shit you just did is not okay.

All of this having been said, there are two things about this book (so far) that I Must Share.

The first is about a tool the (Schwarz) Gottmans' research group uses. Their research group, for context, is called the Love Lab.

Much of the data and observations about couples in conflict in this book comes from our decades of work in the Love Lab and from other important and groundbreaking observational studies by ourselves and other researchers. But now we are getting even more sophisticated and granular information from the AI we trained with John's emotional coding system, called SPAFF, short for Specific Affect Coding System.

... the second, I say, moving swiftly on, is that a little further on in the book I have encountered a genuinely new-to-me evopsych argument: that because of evolutionary pressures it is men who get Extremely Emotional very quickly, and take a long time to calm back down and reach a point where they can engage rationally again!

... At this point: He's flooded. She's flooded. Both hearts are hammering hard; adrenaline is zinging through their veins. Stan's physiological response has ratcheted up and overwhelmed him even faster than Susan's, and he'll take a lot longer to come down from it.

Here's why: For evolutionary reasons having to do with protecting the tribe and hunting dangerous animals for food, our prehistoric male ancestors gained a survival advantage by being able to quickly mount and sustain an adrenaline-packed response to danger. Those with this rapid response were better able to fight off enemies and hunt for food, and because they were better survivors, their genes were more likely to get passed down and eventually inherited by our men today. That kind of enduring fight-or-flight response might have helped Stan's distant ancestors survive, but it isn't doing him any favors now.

tl;dr for all that I regularly kind of want to throw it across the room there are some amazing moments in this thing. I'm only about halfway through! WHO KNOWS what wonders await me!!!

kitewithfish: (jane austen women in window)
kitewithfish ([personal profile] kitewithfish) wrote2026-06-03 04:35 pm
Entry tags:

Wednesday Reading Meme for June 3 2026

What I’ve Read

Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie (Imperial Radch #1)
A re-read for Necromancy Book Club, and man, I am glad I re-read this instead of relying on memory. I had felt rather unmoored while reading it last time, but having the general scope of the plot in my head meant that I could really sit back and enjoy the writing and little character moments. It does such an interesting job of working with the viewpoint of a character who is thinking in first person, but functionally has limited omniscience for segments of the book. I first read this in, I think, 2020, and that overall might have shaped my capacity to really sink into a book – I don’t think I read very well that year. Breq as a character has an incredible drive, and her experiences are both deeply human and deeply inhuman. She loved someone and lost them, she loved her life and lost it, she loved her empire and became disillusioned about it – all of these are very human experiences. And, when you have a character like Breq, for whom a multiplicity of experience is normal, you are getting all of that from multiple angles, sometimes at once. Really tightly written.

Ancillary Sword by Ann Leckie (Imperial Radch #2) – I liked Justice so much that I just picked this This book picks up immediately after Justice, and the focus of the book is a case study of the cold war that Breq revealed in the last book, now out in the open. There’s questions about policing and justice and empire and how to move forward when you can’t change the past. It also does some wonderful montage work of building scenes around music that Breq and her crew are singing.

What I’m Reading

Out of the Dead Land by orphan_account - https://archiveofourown.org/works/1871955 - A Winter Soldier -focused fic. Catnip – this fic focuses on Bucky’s alienation from himself via the metaphor of murderous robots pretending to be real people. The point of view is Bucky’s and the internal conflict as he pieces together what has been done to him, and who he is in the aftermath? Excellently done. (If you like this, worth looking at Some Desperate Glory or Incandescent.)

The Raven Scholar – Static, I should get back to this

Inventing the Renaissance – Ada Palmer – about 75% - This book remains great and really interesting. Her running thread about HOW you first read or teach about the Renaissance shapes how you approach it – honestly great centering point of the book. She talks in the section I read this week about building a syllabus around Machiavelli’s The Prince that gave her students Machiavelli’s letters as well as other historical reference points so that when they finally read The Prince, they have a wealth of context for his writings style and what his references meant to him at the time. I am inspired to try and do something similar myself.
I also found something really interesting in her discussion of Scholasticism as a philosophical movement – the stakes! Her discussion of how Scholastics were trying to reconcile Christian works that were, on the face, diametrical opposite, but endorsed with equal weight by the church – so if you understood them wrong, your literal immortal soul was on the line! And the souls of all your readers! Palmer does a lot of work to help me get to understand the actual weight that this carried for the people living at the time.

What I’ll Read Next
Tomb of Dragons Katherine Addison - reread for Xing Book club

Hugo nominations still to read:

Novels
Death of the Author by Nnedi Okorafor
Shroud by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Novellas
Automatic Noodle by Annalee Newitz (Tordotcom)
Murder by Memory by Olivia Waite (Tordotcom)
The River Has Roots by Amal El-Mohtar (Tordotcom; Arcadia UK)
The Summer War by Naomi Novik (Del Rey US; Del Rey UK)